|
|
To clarify by 'default sort' I meant what users would choose by default. So for:
a) Ratings: 5 star to 1-star: descending
b) Title (and most alphanumeric fields): A to Z - ascending
c) Other numeric fields (Date, Volume co-efficient, etc.): no clear default
So the current implementation is that for the 'default sorts' for a) & b), null values appear at the end of the list. And for c), they appear at the end of a descending list. From my perspective, this results in fewer questions about why tracks are invisible (which occurred previously if, for example, tracks were sorted ascending by Artist, and Artist and all other metadata was missing for the first 50 tracks in the list.
Unless there's clear feedback that the current approach is confusing, I'd be tempted to leave it as is. |
