View Issue Details
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0005876 | MMW v4 | Framework: Tagging | public | 2009-07-13 12:28 | 2014-12-10 11:55 | 
| Reporter | user_chrisjj | Assigned To | |||
| Priority | normal | Severity | minor | Reproducibility | always | 
| Status | feedback | Resolution | reopened | ||
| Platform | Windows | OS | XP | OS Version | - | 
| Target Version | 4.1 | ||||
| Summary | 0005876: Adding Disc# total can make nonsense format | ||||
| Description | See http://www.mediamonkey.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=41311 This occurs in the Now Playing window and Mizery_made reports it also occurs in the library.  | ||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
| Fixed in build | |||||
| related to | 0005758 | closed | Ludek | Track Properties: Presing Delete do not remove selected Album Art from list | 
| related to | 0007245 | closed | Ludek | 1345: Auto-Tag from Filename <Disc#> doesn't support non-numeric values | 
| related to | 0005878 | assigned | jiri | MM hides the /n part (disc qty) of WM/PartOfSet and ID3 TPOS (discnumber) | 
| child of | 0004920 | assigned | Ludek | Support for Total # Discs and Tracks | 
| 
		 | 
	As I explained in the forum post, I don't think it's a bug. We must introduce Total Track and Disc # fields in MM 4.0. | 
| 
		 | 
	
	(Forum http://www.mediamonkey.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=41311& . If nonsense format doesn't make it a bug, perhaps the fact that MM writes non-compliant TPOS does.  | 
| 
		 | 
	No, really, it isn't non-compliant. MM simply currently doesn't support Total Disc # field and so if you enter '1/2' it's understood as an other possible Disc # (like '1', 'A', 'I', 'I,II' or whatever). So writing it back to ID3 in the form it's currently written is perfectly logical and correct. | 
| 
		 | 
	
	> No, really, it isn't non-compliant. ... if you enter '1/2' it's understood as  > an other possible Disc # (like '1', 'A', 'I', 'I,II' or whatever) That's non-compliant - ID3v2 does not allow ""'A', 'I', 'I,II' or whatever".  | 
| 
		 | 
	That's right, non-numerical strings aren't officially allowed in ID3v2 Disc # field, but for obvious reasons (mainly because they are perfectly legal in other tagging formats) we support them. | 
| 
		 | 
	
	>That's right, non-numerical strings aren't officially allowed in ID3v2 Disc # field Hence they are non-compliant and your "isn't non-compliant" is incorrect. > we support them. That doesn't make them compliant.  | 
| 
		 | 
	Reassigning to Ludek for MM5 | 
| 
		 | 
	Assigned back to Jiri. |