Ludek
2014-03-11 23:30
developer
~0039842
Last edited: 2014-03-11 23:33
|
Probably somehow caused by 0011531, but I can't replicate, asking more info.
|
|
Ludek
2014-03-20 13:37
developer
~0039924
Last edited: 2014-03-20 13:38
|
Unfortunatelly Tenuis hasn't replied yet, but there was a change that could have an infuelnce on this (0011955), so I will ask him to test 1698.
|
|
|
Probably fixed by the same fix as 0011774:0039931 in build 1699 |
|
|
Could not replicate using steps 0011774:0039933 so it looks fixed. |
|
Ludek
2014-03-21 10:57
developer
~0039959
Last edited: 2014-03-21 10:59
|
@Peke, Note that you tested 1698, but it was fixed in 1699 so I guess it needs to be confirmed by the users in 1699.
|
|
|
Re Verified 1700 I used SVN 1699 previously |
|