| 
		 		 
		
		
			 Ludek		 
		
						2014-03-11 23:30					 
		
			developer			 
									
				~0039842			
					 
		 Last edited: 2014-03-11 23:33 		
		
		
				 
		 
	 | 
	
	Probably somehow caused by 0011531, but I can't replicate, asking more info. 
 
	 | 
	 | 
		| 
		 		 
		
		
			 Ludek		 
		
						2014-03-20 13:37					 
		
			developer			 
									
				~0039924			
					 
		 Last edited: 2014-03-20 13:38 		
		
		
				 
		 
	 | 
	
	Unfortunatelly Tenuis hasn't replied yet, but there was a change that could have an infuelnce on this (0011955), so I will ask him to test 1698. 
 
	 | 
	 | 
		| 
		 		 
		
	 | 
	
	Probably fixed by the same fix as 0011774:0039931 in build 1699	 | 
	 | 
		| 
		 		 
		
	 | 
	
	Could not replicate using steps 0011774:0039933 so it looks fixed.	 | 
	 | 
		| 
		 		 
		
		
			 Ludek		 
		
						2014-03-21 10:57					 
		
			developer			 
									
				~0039959			
					 
		 Last edited: 2014-03-21 10:59 		
		
		
				 
		 
	 | 
	
	@Peke, Note that you tested 1698, but it was fixed in 1699 so I guess it needs to be confirmed by the users in 1699. 
 
	 | 
	 | 
		| 
		 		 
		
	 | 
	
	Re Verified 1700 I used SVN 1699 previously	 | 
	 |