View Issue Details

IDProjectCategoryView StatusLast Update
0019846MMW 5Tagging / organizing (properties / auto-tools)public2023-11-08 17:16
Reporterpeke Assigned To 
PriorityhighSeverityfeatureReproducibilityN/A
Status feedbackResolutionopen 
Product Version5.0 
Target Version5.1.1 
Summary0019846: Lookup Image: ability to choose standardized lookups via a mask
DescriptionUnlike other MM Auto-Tools Lookup Image do not have option to make user easier change Search term.

We Should add ability that user can fill existing track properties into search field.

Currently user needs to remember search terms and manually enter them in search.

This would solve most issues of wrong Album art found as it will allow users to quickly select search terms and separating parameters.

eg. Select <Artist> -> <Title> and result would be ["Hunter Hayes"+"Wanted"] (MM would add + before filling second selection)

We can also save past search mask so that user can easily select them.

Additional InformationTicket # 5662
TagsNo tags attached.
Fixed in build

Relationships

related to 0019845 resolvedrusty Lookup image do not help users with manual search syntax 

Activities

peke

2023-02-27 12:10

developer   ~0071240

bug19846.jpg (158,779 bytes)   
bug19846.jpg (158,779 bytes)   

peke

2023-04-03 05:36

developer   ~0071426

User from Ticket # 5662 requested same thing.

rusty

2023-11-03 20:46

administrator   ~0073300

I can see this being useful e.g. for classical music (using Composer) or for Singles. It also _seems_ like it would be easy to implement, but the suggested approach isn't ideal in the sense that currently, entering "<Composer> - <Title>" doesn't display what the associated values are--it just shows the mask, and presumably, clicking the dropdown would similarly just display the mask (and in either case, what the user would want to see is the actual values that are being looked up).

Possible approaches to addressing this could be:
1) Upon pressing RETURN for a mask or upon selecting a mask from the dropdown, show the values associated with the mask. The downside of this approach is that there would be no obvious way to edit existing masks (since they immediately convert to values).
2) OR perhaps have a separate means of choosing the Mask. On the other hand, this kind of overcomplicates what should be a very simple UI.

Ludek any thoughts?

Ludek

2023-11-06 14:19

developer   ~0073309

1) I think that having set of pre-configured masks in read-only dropdown should work, that said in the current edit line would be always _result_ of such a mask.
i.e. selecting "<composer>" + "<album>" would result in
"Beethoven" + "Symphony No.9"

rusty

2023-11-07 16:16

administrator   ~0073321

1) Perhaps tapping the '>>' (Mask) button should cause the mask to display instead of the associated values?

Ludek

2023-11-08 17:16

developer   ~0073360

1) yes, sounds reasonable